5,420 barrels unaccounted. Explained in 2 hours.

800 manifests. 8 wells. 3 to 5 days of reconciliation sprint same data, same format, every month. We automate it. You review and submit.

No sales call. Send us one month of manifest data for any single well → fully reconciled injection report → delivered in 48 hours.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

Serving SWD operators and produced water management companies:

Manifest ReconciliationP-18 Monthly ReportingBEG TexNet SubmissionMIT Compliance TrackingPermit Condition MonitoringSource Operator BillingESG Volume ReportingM&A Compliance Packages
Manifest ReconciliationP-18 Monthly ReportingBEG TexNet SubmissionMIT Compliance TrackingPermit Condition MonitoringSource Operator BillingESG Volume ReportingM&A Compliance Packages

Why SWD Operators Use UICReportAI

We automate your UIC compliance workflow. You keep the wells running.

Four weeks from "interested" to "this is working." An operator managing 8 wells that automates manifest reconciliation and P-18 reporting recovers 3 to 5 days of work every month — enough capacity to take on 3 more wells without adding a compliance coordinator.

Proof before payment.

Send us one month of manifest data and meter logs for any single well. We return the fully reconciled, RRC-formatted P-18 within 48 hours. You compare it to what you would have submitted. We invoice only when it works.

We don't build chatbots.

Manifest reconciliation engines. Monthly UIC injection report generators. Permit & MIT compliance trackers. Source operator billing automations. M&A compliance history packages. The difference shows in week two.

Your data stays yours.

Every automation runs in your environment or on-premise on your office server. Your volume data and source operator contracts never touch shared infrastructure. We sign NDAs before touching any operational data. Designed to run offline in low-connectivity Permian Basin and Appalachia sites. No exceptions.

W1
Free Process AuditWe map the workflow, identify the highest-ROI automation. No commitment. NDA available.
W2–3
POC BuildWe build a Proof Of Concept on your real data. You test it.
W4
ValidationYou confirm it works. We iterate if needed.
M2+
RetainerWe invoice, maintain, and expand. Only if you're satisfied.

No sales call. Describe your workflow → response within 24 hours → free analysis sent by email.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

Who We Serve

We work with SWD operators. One standard: the automation runs without you watching it.

Monthly injection report by state deadline. MIT certification every year. One operator managing compliance across 5 to 15 UIC Class II wells. Select a workflow below to see what we automate.

scroll
A — Inventory Ingestion
Excel, ERP export, PDF, email table — structured into Tier II format in under 10 minutes.
Every client sends their chemical inventory differently. Normalizing it into the required Tier II structure — chemical name, CAS number, max quantity, average quantity, physical state, storage location — is the first bottleneck every Q1. We automate it regardless of source format.
Client inventory (any format)
Specialized AI extraction
Field mapping & normalization
Structured Tier II dataset
9/10Automatisability
Any formatExcel · PDF · ERP · email
2–3 weeksPOC turnaround
EPCRA §312 field structureEHS consultant validates final chemical list
B — TPQ/RQ Threshold Check
500 lbs or 10,000 lbs? Every chemical, checked automatically against the full EPA EHS list.
For each chemical in the inventory, a deterministic comparison: 500 lbs threshold for Extremely Hazardous Substances (or their TPQ, whichever is lower), 10,000 lbs for all others. Script runs in seconds, outputs the exact reportable chemical list. Zero judgment required.
Normalized inventory
EPA EHS list lookup
TPQ/RQ comparison
Reportable chemical list
10/10Automatisability
500 / 10,000 lbsEHS vs. general thresholds
SecondsRuntime per facility
EPCRA §312 — EHS threshold logicEPA EHS list updated annually — DB must stay current
C — Tier2 Submit File Generation
Inventory in. Portal-ready .T2S file out. 30 minutes.
Tier2 Submit accepts a standardized XML import. Currently, most consultants fill each facility manually — chemical by chemical, field by field. We generate the import file directly from the normalized, threshold-checked dataset. 80% of states covered with the standard format.
Normalized + checked dataset
Smart automation XML generation
State format mapping
Portal-ready .T2S file
8/10Automatisability
80%States — standard format
30 minInventory to .T2S draft
Tier2 Submit compatible — EPA standardMO, ND, AZ, CT, NM use separate portals
D — SERC/LEPC Contact Verification
A submission sent to a stale email is non-compliant. We flag it before you open the portal.
The most common Tier II error — confirmed across 41,000+ reports analyzed by Encamp — is outdated contact information. SERC, LEPC, and Fire Department contacts change regularly. An automated agent scrapes state public directories and flags every changed contact before submission.
Last year's contacts
SERC/LEPC directory scrape
Delta comparison
Stale contact flags
7/10Automatisability
41,000+Reports analyzed (Encamp)
#1 errorStale contacts in Tier II
3-way submission: SERC / LEPC / Fire DeptNot all states maintain structured digital LEPC directories
E — Year-Over-Year Delta Detection
The chemical added in August that nobody flagged — that's the one that generates the violation.
Your client added a new solvent mid-year. The quantity crosses the TPQ threshold. Nobody updated the Tier II inventory because that's a Q1 task. A flexible coding diff engine compares this year's inventory against last year's and surfaces every change before the reporting window opens.
Current year inventory
Prior year inventory
Flexible coding diff engine
New · Removed · Threshold crossed
Priority action list
10/10Automatisability
3 flagsNew · Removed · Threshold crossed
Pre-Q1Runs at inventory receipt
Pain 3 — the invisible mid-year chemicalRequires N-1 inventory on file
F — TRI Form R Drafting
July 1. Form R pre-filled from production data. You review and sign.
EPCRA §313 TRI reporting: quantities released to air, water, soil, and transferred off-site. Many consultants doing Tier II also handle TRI for the same industrial clients. Specialized AI pre-fills the calculable fields and generates narrative sections from client production data.
Production data + release estimates
Mass balance calculation
Form R / Form A structure
Specialized AI narrative draft
Consultant review & sign
6/10Automatisability
July 1Hard EPA deadline
Same clientsTier II + TRI overlap
EPCRA §313 / EPA TRI portalRequires production data — not just storage quantities
G — Multi-Client Compliance Calendar
30 clients. 5 regulatory deadlines each. One senior consultant tracking all of it in a spreadsheet.
Tier II March 1. TRI July 1. SPCC every 5 years. RCRA biennial, even years. Air permit renewals vary. For a firm managing 30 clients, this is institutional knowledge in one person's head. We move it into a database with automated alerts at J-90, J-60, and J-30.
Client + facility registry
Supabase regulatory calendar
J-90/60/30 trigger logic
Email alerts + monthly digest
9/10Automatisability
5 deadlinesPer client per year (avg)
J-90/60/30Alert cadence
Tier II · TRI · SPCC · RCRA · Air permitsPermit renewal dates entered manually on setup
H — Proof-of-Compliance Package
A billable PDF in 3 minutes. $200–400 per facility. Zero additional work.
After each Tier II submission: timestamped portal confirmation, full chemical list, SERC/LEPC/Fire Dept contacts, and facility record — auto-assembled into a signed PDF. A deliverable your client keeps. On 30 facilities: $6,000–12,000 in additional annual billing at zero marginal cost.
Portal submission confirmation
Chemical list + contacts
Specialized AI compliance letter
Auto-assembled PDF
Consultant sign-off
9/10Automatisability
$200–400Per facility — billable
$6–12KAdditional billing at 30 facilities
Billable compliance artifactConsultant signs before client delivery
A — Inventory Ingestion
Excel, ERP export, PDF, email table — structured into Tier II format in under 10 minutes.
Every client sends their chemical inventory differently. Normalizing it into the required Tier II structure — chemical name, CAS number, max quantity, average quantity, physical state, storage location — is the first bottleneck every Q1. We automate it regardless of source format.
Client inventory (any format)
Specialized AI extraction
Field mapping & normalization
Structured Tier II dataset
9/10Automatisability
Any formatExcel · PDF · ERP · email
2–3 weeksPOC turnaround
EPCRA §312 field structureEHS consultant validates final chemical list
B — TPQ/RQ Threshold Check
500 lbs or 10,000 lbs? Every chemical, checked automatically against the full EPA EHS list.
For each chemical in the inventory, a deterministic comparison: 500 lbs threshold for Extremely Hazardous Substances (or their TPQ, whichever is lower), 10,000 lbs for all others. Script runs in seconds, outputs the exact reportable chemical list. Zero judgment required.
Normalized inventory
EPA EHS list lookup
TPQ/RQ comparison
Reportable chemical list
10/10Automatisability
500 / 10,000 lbsEHS vs. general thresholds
SecondsRuntime per facility
EPCRA §312 — EHS threshold logicEPA EHS list updated annually — DB must stay current
C — Tier2 Submit File Generation
Inventory in. Portal-ready .T2S file out. 30 minutes.
Tier2 Submit accepts a standardized XML import. Currently, most consultants fill each facility manually — chemical by chemical, field by field. We generate the import file directly from the normalized, threshold-checked dataset. 80% of states covered with the standard format.
Normalized + checked dataset
Smart automation XML generation
State format mapping
Portal-ready .T2S file
8/10Automatisability
80%States — standard format
30 minInventory to .T2S draft
Tier2 Submit compatible — EPA standardMO, ND, AZ, CT, NM use separate portals
D — SERC/LEPC Contact Verification
A submission sent to a stale email is non-compliant. We flag it before you open the portal.
The most common Tier II error — confirmed across 41,000+ reports analyzed by Encamp — is outdated contact information. SERC, LEPC, and Fire Department contacts change regularly. An automated agent scrapes state public directories and flags every changed contact before submission.
Last year's contacts
SERC/LEPC directory scrape
Delta comparison
Stale contact flags
7/10Automatisability
41,000+Reports analyzed (Encamp)
#1 errorStale contacts in Tier II
3-way submission: SERC / LEPC / Fire DeptNot all states maintain structured digital LEPC directories
E — Year-Over-Year Delta Detection
The chemical added in August that nobody flagged — that's the one that generates the violation.
Your client added a new solvent mid-year. The quantity crosses the TPQ threshold. Nobody updated the Tier II inventory because that's a Q1 task. A flexible coding diff engine compares this year's inventory against last year's and surfaces every change before the reporting window opens.
Current year inventory
Prior year inventory
Flexible coding diff engine
New · Removed · Threshold crossed
Priority action list
10/10Automatisability
3 flagsNew · Removed · Threshold crossed
Pre-Q1Runs at inventory receipt
Pain 3 — the invisible mid-year chemicalRequires N-1 inventory on file
F — TRI Form R Drafting
July 1. Form R pre-filled from production data. You review and sign.
EPCRA §313 TRI reporting: quantities released to air, water, soil, and transferred off-site. Many consultants doing Tier II also handle TRI for the same industrial clients. Specialized AI pre-fills the calculable fields and generates narrative sections from client production data.
Production data + release estimates
Mass balance calculation
Form R / Form A structure
Specialized AI narrative draft
Consultant review & sign
6/10Automatisability
July 1Hard EPA deadline
Same clientsTier II + TRI overlap
EPCRA §313 / EPA TRI portalRequires production data — not just storage quantities
G — Multi-Client Compliance Calendar
30 clients. 5 regulatory deadlines each. One senior consultant tracking all of it in a spreadsheet.
Tier II March 1. TRI July 1. SPCC every 5 years. RCRA biennial, even years. Air permit renewals vary. For a firm managing 30 clients, this is institutional knowledge in one person's head. We move it into a database with automated alerts at J-90, J-60, and J-30.
Client + facility registry
Supabase regulatory calendar
J-90/60/30 trigger logic
Email alerts + monthly digest
9/10Automatisability
5 deadlinesPer client per year (avg)
J-90/60/30Alert cadence
Tier II · TRI · SPCC · RCRA · Air permitsPermit renewal dates entered manually on setup
H — Proof-of-Compliance Package
A billable PDF in 3 minutes. $200–400 per facility. Zero additional work.
After each Tier II submission: timestamped portal confirmation, full chemical list, SERC/LEPC/Fire Dept contacts, and facility record — auto-assembled into a signed PDF. A deliverable your client keeps. On 30 facilities: $6,000–12,000 in additional annual billing at zero marginal cost.
Portal submission confirmation
Chemical list + contacts
Specialized AI compliance letter
Auto-assembled PDF
Consultant sign-off
9/10Automatisability
$200–400Per facility — billable
$6–12KAdditional billing at 30 facilities
Billable compliance artifactConsultant signs before client delivery

The Real Cost

3 to 5 days of manual reconciliation. Every month. That's not an operations problem. That's a growth ceiling.

The 15th of every month. Same wells. Same data. Same reports built the same way your team has been building them for five years. Your compliance coordinator knows every permit condition, every MIT date, every variance threshold for every well. What happens to that knowledge when she leaves in October?

The 15th of every month. Same wells. Same data. Same reports built the same way your team has been building them for five years. Your compliance coordinator knows every permit condition, every MIT date, every variance threshold for every well. What happens to that knowledge when she leaves in October?

A — Manifest Reconciliation
3–5 days< 2 h
Multi-source manifest data to fully reconciled P-18 volume totals
B — P-18 Report Generation
4–6 h30 min
Reconciled volumes to RRC-formatted P-18 ready for submission
C — MIT & Permit Tracking
ManualAuto
Deadline alerts fired automatically J-90/60/30 before due date

No sales call. Send us your manifest data → injection report draft in 48 hours → no invoice until it works.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

What We Build

Eight automatable workflows. One compliance operation that runs without you watching it.

From truck manifest ingestion to RRC-formatted P-18 — including BEG TexNet export and permit compliance tracking that fires automatically when a deadline approaches. Every automation is monitored, documented, and maintained. If it breaks on the 13th of the month, we know before your compliance coordinator does.

card-background

UIC Monthly Injection Reporting

Manifest volumes and wellhead meter readings reconciled into a state-formatted injection report in under 24 hours. POC on your actual well data — no invoice until you've seen it work.

card-background

UIC Monthly Injection Reporting

Manifest volumes and wellhead meter readings reconciled into a state-formatted injection report in under 24 hours. POC on your actual well data — no invoice until you've seen it work.

card-background

Permit & MIT Compliance Tracking

class FDADossier:
lot = "LOT-2024-0847"
scope = ["batch_rec", "COA", "deviations", "IPC"]
def retrieve(self):
return db.search(

Every permit condition, MIT deadline, and renewal date for every well in your portfolio — surfaced automatically with J-90/60/30 preparation alerts. The compliance knowledge lives in the system, not in one person's spreadsheet.

card-background

Permit & MIT Compliance Tracking

class FDADossier:
lot = "LOT-2024-0847"
scope = ["batch_rec", "COA", "deviations", "IPC"]
def retrieve(self):
return db.search(

Every permit condition, MIT deadline, and renewal date for every well in your portfolio — surfaced automatically with J-90/60/30 preparation alerts. The compliance knowledge lives in the system, not in one person's spreadsheet.

card-background

Billing & ESG Reporting Automation

Trigger

Prompts

Send Email

Source operator volumes aggregated automatically from your manifest data to monthly client invoices. PE investor ESG dashboard built from the same data that feeds your P-18 — one source, three outputs, no reconciliation errors between what you told the regulator and what you told your investors.

card-background

Billing & ESG Reporting Automation

Trigger

Prompts

Send Email

Source operator volumes aggregated automatically from your manifest data to monthly client invoices. PE investor ESG dashboard built from the same data that feeds your P-18 — one source, three outputs, no reconciliation errors between what you told the regulator and what you told your investors.

Smart Automation

Smart Automation

Specialized AI

Specialized AI

Flexible Coding

Flexible Coding

Custom APIs

Custom APIs

Vector Indexing

Vector Indexing

AI Vision (Photos)

AI Vision (Photos)

PDF Generation

PDF Generation

NDA on Request

NDA on Request

About UICReportAI

A small firm. By design.

A small firm. By design.

UICReportAI is not a 200-person agency with junior contractors on your account. We are a specialized automation firm working with a limited number of SWD operators at any time — enough to give each engagement the attention it requires. Every automation is built and maintained by the same people who assessed your workflow in week one. We are based in Wyoming, USA. We work with operators across Texas, Colorado, West Virginia, and the Permian Basin.

UICReportAI is not a 200-person agency with junior contractors on your account. We are a specialized automation firm working with a limited number of SWD operators at any time — enough to give each engagement the attention it requires. Every automation is built and maintained by the same people who assessed your workflow in week one. We are based in Wyoming, USA. We work with operators across Texas, Colorado, West Virginia, and the Permian Basin.

Clément

Automation & Systems · Founder

Automation &

Systems · Founder

Joël

Outreach & Client Success · Founder

Outreach & Client

Success · Founder

Common Questions

The questions worth asking before you reach out.

What does 'free proof of concept' actually mean?

We build a fully functional automation on your actual data — not a demo, not a mockup. You run it, you validate it. We don't send an invoice until you confirm it works as described.

What if the automation doesn't work?

Who owns the automation you build?

What does a retainer include?

How much does it cost?

Is my operational data confidential?

What does 'free proof of concept' actually mean?

We build a fully functional automation on your actual data — not a demo, not a mockup. You run it, you validate it. We don't send an invoice until you confirm it works as described.

What if the automation doesn't work?

Who owns the automation you build?

What does a retainer include?

How much does it cost?

Is my operational data confidential?

Your injection report reconciled and ready in under 2 hours. No commitment.

Send us your manifest exports and injection logs in any format. First injection report delivered within 48 hours. No sales call required.

© 2026 UICReportAI. All rights reserved.